New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Great magma erup­tions had two sources

Date:
April 3, 2018
Source:
University of Helsinki
Summary:
New research may explain controversies related to great magma eruptions.
Share:
FULL STORY

Research at Finnish Museum of Natural History may explain controversies related to great magma eruptions.

The modern continents were formed when Pangea broke into pieces in the Mesozoic time. The splitting of Africa from Antarctica started with great magma eruptions that flooded over an area millions of square kilometres wide.

Remnants of the ancient ocean of lava, the so-called Karoo magma province, are still widespread in southern Africa and have been also discovered in Antarctica. Dr Arto Luttinen from the Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, has studied the lava formations on both continents with his group.

"This kind of eruptions are culmination events of planetary evolution and have caused mass extinctions of life. Yet their origin remains an outstanding question of Earth history" Luttinen explains.

The scientists disagree, for example, whether an enormous ascending plume of hot material caused the generation of magmas from the core-mantle boundary.

"Previous geophysical research has indicated features suggestive of mantle plumes, whereas geochemical studies have concluded based on lava compositions that there was no plume and that the magmas formed when the temperature of the upper mantle gradually got higher under Pangea. The supercontinent acted like a kettle lid" Luttinen summarises.

The previous studies of magma sources have mainly focused on a certain part of the widespread lava formation, however. The study published on March 27 in the international journal Scientific Reports scrutinised compositions of lava samples across the whole region of ancient magma eruptions. Their chemical signatures indicate that lavas in different areas had a different origin.

"The magmas had in fact two contrasting sources. One of them was the upper mantle, as suggested in previous research, whereas the other was most probably a deep mantle plume. Involvement of two different magma sources explains previous contradictory results and presents an interesting new framework for future studies," concludes Luttinen.

The research was funded by the Academy of Finland and is a part of the VALVE project (Volatiles and large volcanic eruptions).


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Helsinki. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Arto V. Luttinen. Bilateral geochemical asymmetry in the Karoo large igneous province. Scientific Reports, 2018; 8 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23661-3

Cite This Page:

University of Helsinki. "Great magma erup­tions had two sources." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 3 April 2018. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180403085856.htm>.
University of Helsinki. (2018, April 3). Great magma erup­tions had two sources. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 25, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180403085856.htm
University of Helsinki. "Great magma erup­tions had two sources." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180403085856.htm (accessed July 25, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES