Science News

Scientists Unravel Ancient Evolutionary History Of Photosynthesis

ScienceDaily (Sep. 18, 2000) — BLOOMINGTON, Ind. -- All life on Earth depends on photosynthesis for food and oxygen. The origin of this crucial process in green plants is a longstanding problem in biology, and a number of different theories have been proposed to explain it. But there has been no clear evidence to support any of these theories.

In a paper in the Sept. 8 issue of the journal Science, a team of biologists lead by Carl E. Bauer, Clyde Culbertson Professor of Biology at Indiana University, reports the results of their study of the evolution of photosynthesis.

In photosynthesis, green plants use the energy of sunlight to convert carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons that promote plant growth while generating oxygen from water and releasing the oxygen to the atmosphere. All animals including humans depend either directly or indirectly on this source of food and oxygen. Consequently, photosynthesis is considered the most important chemical process on Earth.

Scientists agree that photosynthesis originated in bacteria, with some bacteria containing photosystems that release oxygen in a way very similar to that found in green plants today, and some other bacteria containing simplified photosystems that do not release oxygen. What was not clear is which species of bacteria contains the most ancient photosystem and how photosynthesis in green plants evolved from photosynthesis in bacteria.

By generating a large new molecular data set, Bauer's group, which includes IU postdoctoral fellow Jin Xiong and IU doctoral student William Fischer, has determined that non-oxygen-producing bacterial species such as the purple and green bacteria are the most ancient photosynthetic bacteria. Another group of non-oxygen-producing bacteria known as heliobacteria evolved later.

The scientists also found that heliobacteria are the most closely related to the common ancestor of the oxygen-producing photosynthetic cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria eventually gave rise to chloroplasts in algae and green plants, and chloroplasts are the small bodies in plant cells that carry out photosynthesis today.

The Bauer group's results reverse the conventional thinking on the evolution of photosynthetic bacteria, in which purple bacteria were considered one of the last bacterial species to evolve, not one of the first.

The Bauer group's work also reinforces recent fundamental changes in molecular genetics that show bacteria evolved in a complex manner that resembles a tangled briar patch, with branches going every which way from a number of stems, instead of a traditional evolutionary tree that shows all species neatly branching out from a single stem that represents their common ancestor, usually regarded as the universal ancestral cell. This change in perspective is necessary because gene-swapping was common among ancient bacteria early in evolution.

The work of Bauer's group demonstrates that scientists must study the evolution of individual metabolic processes such as photosynthesis rather than the evolution of entire bacterial organisms.

Bauer's Web site is at http://sunflower.bio.indiana.edu/~cbauer/bauerlab/.


Adapted from materials provided by Indiana University.
APA

MLA

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 44,032

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.
 

Science Video News


Can Carbon Dioxide Be A Good Thing?

A physicist from Colorado State University and his colleagues from the North American Carbon Program (NACP) have discerned and confirmed the. ...  > full story

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Copyright Reuters 2008. See Restrictions.

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of the new ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
close
Include this item in your blog or web site:
close
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
close
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague:
close