Save
Email
Print
ShareScienceDaily (Feb. 26, 2007) — A breath test can successfully pick up lung cancer with "moderate accuracy" even in the early stages, reveals research published ahead of print in Thorax.
It could revolutionise the way cancer is detected and potentially save lives, say the authors.
The test comprises a chemical colour sensor, which detects tiny changes in the unique chemical signature of the breath of people with lung cancer.
Metabolic changes in lung cancer cells cause changes in the production and processing of volatile organic compounds, which are then breathed out
The researchers used the colour sensor to test the breath of 122 people with different types of respiratory disease, and 21 healthy people.
Included in the group with respiratory illness were 49 people with small cell lung cancer at various stages of development.
The research team used the sensor results from 70% of the study participants to develop a predictive model, the accuracy of which was then tested on the remaining 30%.
The results showed that the test was able to accurately predict the presence of cancer in just under three out of four of those with lung cancer.
The results were not affected by age, gender, or stage of disease.
Other approaches to breath testing have been used, say the authors. This includes gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, which requires a great deal of expertise to use and is very expensive.
As cancer is often silent in its early stages and symptoms are often not specific, it is often difficult to pick up the disease at a stage when it could be treated effectively, say the authors.
Diagnosis is often therefore only made when the disease is advanced.
"Ultimately, this line of investigation could lead to an inexpensive, non-invasive screening or diagnostic test for lung cancer," they conclude.
Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google +1:
Other bookmarking and sharing tools:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by BMJ Specialty Journals, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
more 
