Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Seepage Of Drugs From Hog Farms Not An Environmental Problem, Study Suggests

Date:
September 3, 2007
Source:
University Of Guelph
Summary:
Environmental activists have long criticized pharmaceutical use by hog farmers and veterinarians in treating swine disease, saying pharmaceuticals are being overused and errantly contaminating the environment. But new research suggests that environmental contamination from antibiotics does not pose appreciable risks to soil and aquatic organisms. The scientists have determined that pharmaceuticals represent negligible environmental risk if used as instructed.

Prof. Paul Sibley (left) of the Department of Environmental Biology and Prof. Keith Solomon of the Centre for Toxicology used this equipment to simulate real-life scenarios of pharmaceutical use by farmers and veterinarians, and found there was negligible environmental risk.
Credit: Martin Schwalbe

Environmental activists have long criticized pharmaceutical use by hog farmers and veterinarians in treating swine disease, saying pharmaceuticals are being overused and errantly contaminating the environment. But new research from the University of Guelph has shown that environmental contamination from antibiotics does not pose appreciable risks to soil and aquatic organisms.

Prof. Paul Sibley of the Department of Environmental Biology and Prof. Keith Solomon of the Centre for Toxicology have wrapped up six years of research examining the use of pharmaceuticals in the Canadian hog and cattle industry. They’ve determined that the pharmaceuticals represent negligible environmental risk if used as instructed.

“It’s good news for producers, veterinarians and pharmaceutical companies,” says Sibley. “We’ve found evidence that suggests there’s little risk to soil and aquatic biota from using pharmaceutical products, so there’s little need to be concerned.”

Pharmaceuticals first raised concerns when they were detected in the environment more than a decade ago. It was thought they could cause contamination through simple routine practices such as manure spreading. Animals administered antibiotics excreted them through feces or urine, which was then applied to land and could cause damage to soil systems or migrate into nearby waterways.

But was this true? To find out, the research team simulated real-life scenarios in the laboratory and field to study pharmaceutical toxicity. They applied pharmaceuticals directly to soil and water to simulate field exposure. This direct exposure would be similar to an actual worst-case scenario, making it a good test of potential risks, says Sibley. In toxicity, safety (or risk) is often measured as the difference between what is found in the environment and what the pharmaceutical’s toxicity is known to be, he says.

In most experiments, he found that the toxicity effects of pharmaceuticals were in the milligram- to gram-per-litre range. That was significantly higher than the nanogram- to microgram-per-litre range typically detected in soil and water for pharmaceuticals.

Sibley says the long duration of some of the studies helped to accurately assess changes in contamination levels and toxicity over time, ultimately leading to a stronger conclusion that supports environmental safety.

“It’s comforting to know that levels of antibiotics in the environment don’t seem to be posing a problem. We’ve tested aquatic, vertebrate, fish and soil communities, and the evidence clearly indicates little cause for concern.”

He says there’s been a strong push by consumers and activists over the last decade to reduce pharmaceutical use on pig farms. Programs such as the Canadian Quality Assurance are helping to inform farmers about proper protocols and how to manage the antibiotics given on the farm. The program also helps with traceability should contamination occur.

“I hope this research still encourages pharmaceutical companies, veterinarians and producers to be more efficient with their antibiotic treatments but, at the same time, eases any thoughts of potential negative environmental effects.”

This research was funded by the Canadian Pork Council through the Livestock Environmental Initiative, the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association and the Canadian Network of Toxicology Centres.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University Of Guelph. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

University Of Guelph. "Seepage Of Drugs From Hog Farms Not An Environmental Problem, Study Suggests." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 3 September 2007. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070901113342.htm>.
University Of Guelph. (2007, September 3). Seepage Of Drugs From Hog Farms Not An Environmental Problem, Study Suggests. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 29, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070901113342.htm
University Of Guelph. "Seepage Of Drugs From Hog Farms Not An Environmental Problem, Study Suggests." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070901113342.htm (accessed July 29, 2014).

Share This




More Plants & Animals News

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Deadly Ebola Virus Threatens West Africa

Deadly Ebola Virus Threatens West Africa

AP (July 28, 2014) West African nations and international health organizations are working to contain the largest Ebola outbreak in history. It's one of the deadliest diseases known to man, but the CDC says it's unlikely to spread in the U.S. (July 28) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating

Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating

AP (July 28, 2014) Classes are being offered nationwide to encourage African Americans to learn about cooking fresh foods based on traditional African cuisine. The program is trying to combat obesity, heart disease and other ailments often linked to diet. (July 28) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Asteroid's Timing Was 'Colossal Bad Luck' For The Dinosaurs

Asteroid's Timing Was 'Colossal Bad Luck' For The Dinosaurs

Newsy (July 28, 2014) The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs struck at the worst time for them. A new study says that if it hit earlier or later, they might've survived. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge from Nest

Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge from Nest

AP (July 27, 2014) A live-streaming webcam catches loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings emerging from a nest in the Florida Keys. (July 27) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins