Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Voluntary Carbon Standard Lacks Credibility, WWF Argues

Nov. 29, 2007 — A new standard for carbon offsets fails to guarantee climate benefits and promote sustainable development, and could further increase insecurity and volatility in the carbon offsets market, says WWF.


Share This:

The Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS), launched by the Climate Group, the International Association for Emission Trading, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, is meant to set a minimum benchmark for the quality of carbon offsets. It is designed to offer the most basic set of rules, focused primarily on lowering transaction costs and carbon prices to consumers.

WWF argues, however, that the VCS cannot guarantee that accredited projects really reduce climate-damaging emissions, and its verification systems are insufficient. By waiving all environmental and social safeguards as well as requirements for stakeholder consultation, the VCS substantially increases the non-carbon risks of VCS projects.

"This new standard simply lacks credibility," says Liam Salter of WWF-Hong Kong.

"Carbon buyers using the VCS will remain exposed to significant risk. The VCS cannot guarantee that credits are real nor projects valuable to host countries."

WWF recommends buyers take extra steps to ensure they are acting responsibly.

Foregoing many essential checks and balances in terms of managing both carbon and non-carbon risk, the VCS appears to rely to a considerable degree on the goodwill and integrity of project developers whose commercial success depends on the sales of credits. WWF believes that this approach carries significant potential risk for buyers and the environment.

"The voluntary carbon offset market is becoming like the Wild West," says Hans Verolme, Director of WWF's Global Climate Change Programme.

"We are concerned that bad offset projects will register under the VCS to make a quick buck. If the VCS Board is serious about its standard they should screen its impact in a very transparent way and show they are ready to make improvements."

Carbon offsetting, if used appropriately, could play a limited part in strategies to reduce carbon emissions and contribute to sustainable development, helping to catalyze the transition globally to a low-carbon economy.

The voluntary market could also help: projects to be undertaken in countries where capacity and expertise in applying Clean Development Mechanism accreditation is lacking; enable small projects to gain access to the carbon markets; and provide a test bed that allows innovation and testing of new technologies and ideas.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by World Wildlife Fund.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 137,433

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google:

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Science Video News


Can Carbon Dioxide Be A Good Thing?

A physicist from Colorado State University and his colleagues from the North American Carbon Program (NACP) have discerned and confirmed the. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
Include this item in your blog or web site:
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague: