Science News
from research organizations

Prior herbicide use -- not irrigation -- is critical to herbicide efficacy

Date:
May 5, 2010
Source:
USDA/Agricultural Research Service
Summary:
Crop and herbicide use history are more critical to herbicide efficacy and environmental safety than the timing and amount of irrigation water used, according to agricultural scientists.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

ARS plant physiologist Dale Shaner has found that, while the herbicide atrazine breaks down more quickly in fields that have been previously treated with the herbicide, the amount of irrigation does not affect the degradation rate at all.
Credit: Photo by Peggy Greb

Crop and herbicide use history are more critical to herbicide efficacy and environmental safety than the timing and amount of irrigation water used, according to Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists.

ARS plant physiologists Dale Shaner and Lori Wiles made this discovery from ongoing experiments on two irrigated fields at Colorado State University (CSU) at Fort Collins, Colo. Shaner and Wiles work in the ARS Water Management Research Unit at Fort Collins.

In collaboration with CSU colleague Neil Hansen, Shaner and Wiles compared the behavior of the herbicide atrazine in conventionally tilled corn grown continuously year after year versus corn grown in three different crop rotations. They tested various levels of tillage and irrigation, including no irrigation.

The amount of irrigation used -- including a total absence of irrigation -- had no impact on the rate of degradation of atrazine by soil microbes in the top foot of soil. The only factors that made a difference were prior herbicide use and the choice of crop sequences, with prior herbicide use the most important factor by far.

Earlier studies, including one by Shaner, have shown that previous applications of atrazine can predispose soil to more quickly degrade later applications of the herbicide. But until now, it was not clear if other factors such as cropping history and quantity of irrigation played a role.

There are two consequences of the more rapid dissipation of atrazine in the plots with a history of use. The first consequence is a loss in weed control. In the plots with the most rapid dissipation, weeds began to re-infest the plots within four weeks after treatment, while the plots with the slowest rate of dissipation remained weed-free through the growing season.

The second consequence is that atrazine leached more deeply in the soil in the plots where it did not dissipate rapidly, but the herbicide did not move below the top three inches of the soil in the plots where it was degraded rapidly.

This research was published in the Journal of Environmental Quality.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by USDA/Agricultural Research Service. The original item was written by Don Comis. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Dale L. Shaner, Lori Wiles, and Neil Hansen. Behavior of Atrazine in Limited Irrigation Cropping Systems in Colorado: Prior Use Is Important. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2009; 38 (5): 1861 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0463

Cite This Page:

USDA/Agricultural Research Service. "Prior herbicide use -- not irrigation -- is critical to herbicide efficacy." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 5 May 2010. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100317101353.htm>.
USDA/Agricultural Research Service. (2010, May 5). Prior herbicide use -- not irrigation -- is critical to herbicide efficacy. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 5, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100317101353.htm
USDA/Agricultural Research Service. "Prior herbicide use -- not irrigation -- is critical to herbicide efficacy." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100317101353.htm (accessed September 5, 2015).

Share This Page: