Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Have European Forests Grown Older, or Are They Actually Getting Younger?

Dec. 13, 2012 — Europe's forests have changed drastically since the 1950s when forest and land use management caught up with the effects of the World War II. The forest area increased by 30% between 1950 and 2000 as low productive agricultural lands were abandoned and many countries were carrying out active afforestation. Today, forest management is very much in the focus of attention especially in the light of increasing the use of forest biomass for energy.


Share This:

One of the most common perceptions has been -- until now -- that European forests were young after the World War II due to the extensive cuttings carried out following the war. But were our forests really younger then? A group of international scientists have now compiled detailed information from historic forest inventories to reconstruct forest age class structure changes from 1950 to 2010. The results are partly surprising, because the average age of forests today is actually a few years lower than in 1950. The share of old forests declined quite strongly from 1950 to 1980, when the average age was at its minimum. Only after 1980 there has been a slight increase in the share of older forests.

The scientists used an innovative combination of inventory data and backcasting to reconstruct and map the forest age class structure from 1950 to 2010. This information is now used in the GHG-EUROPE project to improve the representation of forest management history in biogeochemical simulation models that are run to study the human influence on the greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes of European land use systems.

What do these results tell us about past forest management? The results now show that since the 1950s, our forests became younger -- but at the same time they gained in growing stock and stored more carbon. This means that the old forests that were cut in the 1950-1970s probably looked different from old forests today: they were less dense and probably less uniform in age than the typical conifer stands that replace them.

The full article "Reconstructed forest age structure in Europe 1950-2010" by Terhi Vilén and others has been published in Forest Ecology and Management.

Further information can be found on the GHG EUROPE projet (http://www.ghg-europe.eu/).

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by European Forest Institute.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. T. Vilén, K. Gunia, P.J. Verkerk, R. Seidl, M.-J. Schelhaas, M. Lindner, V. Bellassen. Reconstructed forest age structure in Europe 1950–2010. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012; 286: 203 DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.048
APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 137,122

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Science Video News


Forest Robot Fleet

Fleets of robotic sensors, networking through thin cables, can track environmental changes such as biogeochemical cycles or loss of biodiversity,. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
Include this item in your blog or web site:
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague: