Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Why Some Don't Respond to Rubella Vaccine

May 1, 2013 — Using advanced genetic sequencing technology and analysis, Mayo Clinic vaccine researchers have identified 27 genes that respond in very different ways to the standard rubella vaccine, making the vaccine less effective for a portion of the population.


Share This:

The findings appear today in the online journal PLOS ONE.

"This study highlighted the genes potentially responsible for poor response to the rubella vaccine," says Mayo Clinic vaccinologist Gregory Poland, M.D. "We found differences in genes responsible for antigen interactions, inflammation and differences in the gene pathways involved between low and high vaccine responders. It's another instance of using individualized medicine approaches to find potential solutions for patients not benefiting from standard treatments."

Researchers in the Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group began with a random sample of 738 healthy children and young adults who had had two doses of the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine and then selected 25 individuals who represented either high or low responders. Samples from those participants were subject to sequencing of messenger RNA, resulting in transcriptional data that was analyzed for differences in gene expression.

This was the first Next Generation (high-speed, high-throughput) gene expression profiling and analysis conducted after rubella vaccination that provided quantitative data. Researchers say the findings will help in efforts to better understand reactions to the existing rubella vaccine and be very useful in developing alternative vaccines so individuals in the low-response group can be adequately protected.

Co-authors on the study include Iana Haralambieva, M.D., Ph.D.; Ann Oberg, Ph.D.; Inna Ovsyannikova, Ph.D.; Richard Kennedy, Ph.D.; Diane Grill, Sumit Middha, Brian Bot, Vivian Wang, Ph.D.; David I. Smith, Ph.D.; and Robert Jacobson, M.D., all of Mayo Clinic.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Mayo Clinic.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Iana H. Haralambieva, Ann L. Oberg, Inna G. Ovsyannikova, Richard B. Kennedy, Diane E. Grill, Sumit Middha, Brian M. Bot, Vivian W. Wang, David I. Smith, Robert M. Jacobson, Gregory A. Poland. Genome-Wide Characterization of Transcriptional Patterns in High and Low Antibody Responders to Rubella Vaccination. PLoS ONE, 2013; 8 (5): e62149 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062149
APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,690

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
Interested in ad-free access? If you'd like to read ScienceDaily without ads, let us know!
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google:

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

  • more science news

In Other News ...

  • more top news

Science Video News


Faster Flu Vaccine

Spraying viral genes directly through the skin is a new technique that turns infinitesimal amounts of DNA into an effective vaccine. If approved for. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?