Wolbachia, a symbiont that resides naturally up to 70% of all insect species, are probably the most prevalent infectious bacteria on Earth. In 2008 Luis Teixeira, now a principal investigator at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, and other scientists have discovered that Wolbachia can protect their hosts against viral infections. Since then, several studies have been made to further investigate the interactions between Wolbachia and insects, aiming to build new strategies to use this bacterium in the control of diseases transmitted by mosquitoes, such as dengue.
Now, Luis Teixeira's research team studied the genetic variability of Wolbachia strains and discovered that bacteria that give stronger protection against virus grow to higher concentrations and often shorten the host's lifespan. These results help to understand Wolbachia evolution in nature and open the way to the identification of the best strains to be used in the biocontrol of mosquito-spread diseases. This work was published in the latest issue of PLOS Genetics.
Since the beginning of the 20th century, different lines of fruit flies are being collected and analysed in laboratory, which allowed the identification of five strains of Wolbachia. Nowadays, the strains that are more predominant are not the same that existed in the beginning of the past century, even though the later still endure. Luis Teixeira's team proposed to study these five Wolbachia strains and see how they behave in terms of antiviral protection.
The researchers tested the mortality of fruit flies upon infection with two viruses, the Drosophila C virus and the Flock House virus. As expected, all flies carrying the different variants of Wolbachia survived better than flies that did not have Wolbachia. But the researchers found that some variants conferred higher protection to the viral infection than others. Next, the research team investigated whether the Wolbachia variants could have a "biological cost" to the fruit flies in the absence of a viral infection. Their results showed that the variants that give stronger antiviral protection replicate more and reach higher concentrations in the fly than other Wolbachia strains. As a result, fruit flies that carried some of the more protective Wolbachia strains would have a shorter lifespan. These results suggest that there is a cost for the host organism when infected with bacteria that offer stronger protection against viruses.
Based on genetic studies, the research team established the phylogeny of Wolbachia strains, and found that that the most protective strains were more closely related to the most abundant ones in the beginning of the 20th century. The strains that currently exist are less protective but more benign to their host, the fruit fly, allowing them longer lifespan. Furthermore, analysis of the DNA sequences allowed the identification of putative genes that may play a role in Wolbachia replication and protection to viruses.
Ewa Chrostek, PhD student at Teixeira's laboratory and first author of this study, says: "We found that some of the most protective Wolbachia variants reduce the survival of their hosts, suggesting that there may be a trade-off between the protection mediated by the symbiotic bacteria and other components of fitness. Altogether, we can understand better how Wolbachia are evolving in nature."
Luís Teixeira adds: "Our findings can feed into the research that is currently being done to disrupt dengue transmission between people by introducing in nature mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia. By knowing better the genetic variability of the Wolbachia variants, a more effective strain can be used in this biocontrol strategy. Moreover, this work helps to predicted the evolution of Wolbachia in these altered mosquito populations."
- Ewa Chrostek, Marta S. P. Marialva, Sara S. Esteves, Lucy A. Weinert, Julien Martinez, Francis M. Jiggins, Luis Teixeira. Wolbachia Variants Induce Differential Protection to Viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: A Phenotypic and Phylogenomic Analysis. PLoS Genetics, 2013; 9 (12): e1003896 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003896
Cite This Page: