Science News
from research organizations

Quality-of-life Yardstick May Not Apply To Children With Serious Urologic Conditions

Date:
October 29, 2007
Source:
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Summary:
A small but revealing study suggests that a widely used tool to measure physical, emotional and psychological functioning and well-being in children may fail to accurately gauge these quality-of-life indicators in the children with some of the most severe bladder conditions, such as spina bifida and bladder exstrophies. Another possibility is that children with such conditions manage to adapt and have a relatively normal quality of life, researchers say.
Share:
FULL STORY

A small but revealing study from the Johns Hopkins Children's Center suggests that a widely used tool to measure physical, emotional and psychological functioning and well-being in children may fail to accurately gauge these quality-of-life indicators in the children with some of the most severe bladder conditions, such as spina bifida and bladder exstrophies.

Another possibility is that children with such conditions manage to adapt and have a relatively normal quality of life, researchers say. 

Using a standard questionnaire, researchers surveyed 50 children between the ages of 11 and 17 with bladder abnormalities that can cause incontinence, among other distressing effects. Surprisingly, researchers found no real difference in quality-of-life reports between children with such chronic conditions and children without them.

"Our findings suggest that either our tool is not sensitive enough to measure well-being and functioning in children with urological conditions, or that these children somehow adapt to their disability," says lead investigator Jennifer Dodson, M.D., a pediatric urologist at Hopkins.

Even more surprisingly, children with chronic urological conditions scored higher than healthy children in certain areas such as risk-taking, an exciting finding that may indicate that such children, in fact, do better in some aspects of daily life, researchers say.

"It is true that some children learn to cope and live with their disability, yet we are still concerned that we may be lacking a precise-enough radar to detect those who do not adapt and continue to suffer," Dodson says.

Fine-tuning existing quality-of-life screens will allow researchers to:

  • Design better ways for children to cope with their disability.
  • Compare the efficacy of treatments by measuring before and after quality-of-life reports.

 These findings are being presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics Conference Oct. 26 through Oct. 30 in San Francisco.

Other researchers in the study: Susan Furth, M.D. Ph.D., John P. Gearhart, M.D., both of Hopkins Children's; Albert W. Wu, M.D., Chun-Ju Hsiao, M.H.S., Marie Diener-West, Ph.D., of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Eric Levey, M.D., of the Kennedy Krieger Institute.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. "Quality-of-life Yardstick May Not Apply To Children With Serious Urologic Conditions." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 29 October 2007. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071026171719.htm>.
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. (2007, October 29). Quality-of-life Yardstick May Not Apply To Children With Serious Urologic Conditions. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071026171719.htm
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. "Quality-of-life Yardstick May Not Apply To Children With Serious Urologic Conditions." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071026171719.htm (accessed May 23, 2017).

RELATED STORIES