Science News
from research organizations

How hashtags and @ symbols affect language on Twitter

When audience size changes, so do the words

Date:
September 9, 2015
Source:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Summary:
When tweeters use hashtags, they tend to be more formal and drop the use of abbreviations and emoticons. But when they use the @ symbol to address smaller audiences, they're more likely to use non-standard words such as 'nah,' 'cuz' and 'smh.' When they tweet to others in the same city, they're more likely to use unique words specific to that area, a new study shows.
Share:
FULL STORY

Despite all the shortened words and slang seen on Twitter, it turns out that people follow many of the same communication etiquette rules on social media as they do in speech. Research from the Georgia Institute of Technology shows that when tweeters use hashtags -- a practice that can enable messages to reach more people -- they tend to be more formal and drop the use of abbreviations and emoticons. But when they use the @ symbol to address smaller audiences, they're more likely to use non-standard words such as "nah," "cuz" and "smh." The study also found when people write to someone from the same city, they are even more likely to use non-standard language -- often lingo that is specific to that geographical area.

Jacob Eisenstein, an assistant professor in Georgia Tech's School of Interactive Computing, led the research. His team sifted through three years of tweets ¬- a pool that included 114 million geotagged messages from 2.77 million users. He says the study helps explain a puzzle about language in social media.

"Since social media facilitates conversations between people all over the world, we were curious why we still see such a remarkable degree of geographical differentiation in online language," said Eisenstein. "Our research shows that the most geographically differentiated language is more likely to be used in messages that will reach only a local audience, and therefore, will be less likely to spread to other locations."

For example, while the emoticon :) is used everywhere, the alternative ;o is significantly more popular in Los Angeles. Similarly, "mayne," a drawn out way of pronouncing "man," is more likely to be found in Houston than anywhere else.

"People want to show their regional identity or their tech savviness, using Twitter-specific terms, to their close social network ties," said Umashanthi Pavalanathan, a Georgia Tech graduate research scientist who worked on the study.

Eisenstein has looked at popular Twitter word trends and their origins for the last seven years. The more he studies, the more he realizes that Twitter users are smarter than most people give them credit for.

"This research shows that for many people on Twitter, non-standard English is not a question of ability, but of reserving standard English for the right social situations," said Eisenstein. "In this sense, heavy social media users have an especially nuanced understanding of language, since they maintain multiple linguistic systems. They know to use each system when it's socially appropriate."

The paper, "Audience-Modulated Variation in Online Social Media," is published in the journal American Speech.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Georgia Institute of Technology. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. U. Pavalanathan, J. Eisenstein. AUDIENCE-MODULATED VARIATION IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA. American Speech, 2015; 90 (2): 187 DOI: 10.1215/00031283-3130324

Cite This Page:

Georgia Institute of Technology. "How hashtags and @ symbols affect language on Twitter: When audience size changes, so do the words." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 9 September 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150909124834.htm>.
Georgia Institute of Technology. (2015, September 9). How hashtags and @ symbols affect language on Twitter: When audience size changes, so do the words. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 26, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150909124834.htm
Georgia Institute of Technology. "How hashtags and @ symbols affect language on Twitter: When audience size changes, so do the words." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150909124834.htm (accessed May 26, 2017).

RELATED STORIES