New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

People walking to work or an errand more likely to stroll into dangerous areas

May 30, 2017
Drexel University
Pedestrians with a purpose, such as going to work or a store, were more likely to walk in areas with a higher risk of being hit by a car, compared to walkers on recreational strolls, a new study has found.

People taking leisurely strolls tend to choose safer walking routes than those heading to work or on an errand, a new study found.

Led by D. Alex Quistberg, Ph.D., an assistant research professor in the Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University, the study used GPS, accelerometers and travel logs from a 2008-2009 survey in King County, Washington -- which includes Seattle -- to measure the path and purpose of 537 pedestrians. That data was then compared to maps on the probability of pedestrian collision risk, and the study was published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Quistberg and his team found that pedestrians on recreational walks were 8 percent less likely to be in areas where car collision risks were higher than those on utilitarian walks (walking somewhere with a purpose).

"There's likely a mix of things happening here," Quistberg said. "On recreational walks, people likely want a more relaxing path than someone on a utilitarian walk."

The study also found that people who took longer walks, both in distance and time, were less likely to stray into dangerous areas (where car-collision risk is high). That, too, was likely tied to recreational walks vs. walks with a purpose. The study also took demographic data into account. This yielded the finding that people who lived in single-family homes, owned homes and/or owned a car all were less likely to walk in more dangerous areas.

People who participated in the survey who had children were slightly less likely -- around 2 percent -- to walk in areas with high collision risk.

"This could be due to people with children living in single-family homes, which are usually in neighborhoods that have a low risk of pedestrians collisions because of low traffic and slow speeds," Quistberg explained. "It is also possible that people with children at home are walking more cautiously, perhaps with their children."

Recently, Dornsife School of Public Health Dean Ana Diez Roux, M.D., Ph.D., signed on to a letter supported by former president Jimmy Carter that appealed for protection of the walking paths of children, especially those headed to school. And although results from Quistberg's study analyze adult pedestrians in Washington state, he believes they reveal information that could serve to improve walkability universally.

"Improving road safety for pedestrians will support interest in walking for recreation as well as those who integrate a healthy walk into their commute," Quistberg said.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Drexel University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. D. Alex Quistberg, Eric J. Howard, Philip M. Hurvitz, Anne V. Moudon, Beth E. Ebel, Frederick P. Rivara, Brian E. Saelens. The Relationship Between Objectively Measured Walking and Risk of Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Collision. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2017; 185 (9): 810 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx020

Cite This Page:

Drexel University. "People walking to work or an errand more likely to stroll into dangerous areas." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 30 May 2017. <>.
Drexel University. (2017, May 30). People walking to work or an errand more likely to stroll into dangerous areas. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 11, 2023 from
Drexel University. "People walking to work or an errand more likely to stroll into dangerous areas." ScienceDaily. (accessed December 11, 2023).

Explore More
from ScienceDaily