New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Automated news video production is better with a human touch

Date:
May 16, 2024
Source:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Summary:
AI-generated videos for short messages are only as well received as manually created ones if they are edited by humans.
Share:
FULL STORY

AI-generated videos for short messages are only as well received as manually created ones if they are edited by humans.

News organizations -- including Bloomberg, Reuters, and The Economist -- have been using AI powered video services to meet growing audience demand for audio-visual material. A study recently published in the journal Journalism now shows that the automated production of news videos is better with human supervision.

Technology providers like Wochit and Moovly are allowing publishers to mass produce videos at scale. But what do audiences think of the results? Researchers led by LMU communication scientist Professor Neil Thurman have found that only automated videos which have been post-edited by humans were as well liked as fully human-made videos.

"Our research shows that, on average, news consumers liked short-form, automated news videos as much as manually made ones, as long as the automation process involved human supervision," says Neil Thurman, from LMU's Department of Media and Communication.

Together with Dr. Sally Stares (London School of Economic) and Dr. Michael Koliska (Georgetown University), Thurman evaluated the reactions of 4,200 UK news consumers to human-made, highly-automated, and partly-automated videos that covered a variety of topics including Christiano Ronaldo, Donald Trump, and the Wimbledon tennis championships. The partly-automated videos were post-edited by humans after the initial automation process.

The results show that there were no significant differences in how much news audiences liked the human-made and partly-automated videos overall. By contrast, highly-automated videos were liked significantly less. In other words, the results show that news video automation is better with human supervision.

According to Thurman, "one key takeaway of the study is that video automation output may be best when it comes in a hybrid form, meaning a human-machine collaboration. Such hybridity involves more human supervision, ensuring that automated video production maintains quality standards while taking advantage of computers' strengths, such as speed and scale."


Story Source:

Materials provided by Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Neil Thurman, Sally Stares, Michael Koliska. Audience evaluations of news videos made with various levels of automation: A population-based survey experiment. Journalism, 2024; DOI: 10.1177/14648849241243189

Cite This Page:

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. "Automated news video production is better with a human touch." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 16 May 2024. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240516122602.htm>.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. (2024, May 16). Automated news video production is better with a human touch. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 25, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240516122602.htm
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. "Automated news video production is better with a human touch." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240516122602.htm (accessed June 25, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES