New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Better off apart: Wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius revised and proved separate

Date:
July 20, 2015
Source:
Pensoft Publishers
Summary:
An international team conducted a research into the two parasitoid wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius, concluding that although sometimes indistinguishable in practice, the two taxa are actually separate ones. The scientists also added 28 new species between them. While slight morphological differences set the two genera apart, biological, ecological, and molecular differences are the key to separate many species.
Share:
FULL STORY

Dr. Jose Fernandez-Triana and his team revised the wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius, which at time have proven to be difficult to recognize. Their findings provide new evidence for them being separate genera. The scientists also added as many as 28 new species of moth predators between the two groups.

During the research they used species from the Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in Costa Rica as well as previously published detailed data. As a result, the biologists managed to make their suggestion about the relation between the different species and their hosts. The study can be found in the open-access journal Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift.

Belonging to one of the main groups of parasitizing caterpillars subfamilies, the wasp genera of Microplitis and Snellenius are quite unique in comparison to their relatives. However, some of the species from the two presently studied groups are almost identical physically. Therefore, the scientists needed to turn to ecological, biological and molecular characteristics in order to define all of them as separate taxa.

Dr. Fernandez-Triana and his team's research was one of the first to look into the tropical populations of the Microplitis and Snellenius genera. Their work answered another unresolved question: all species from the two studied genera that live in the tropical region of Costa Rica have thick hard cocoons and most of them spend the dry months inactively in them.

Another long-argued problem has been the dependency between the localities of each genera and their specialised hosts, as it's been concluded that they are highly selective. Although in their present study the scientists admit that additional Neotropical areas need to be studied, they have concluded that all of the species are "unambiguously specialists," feeding on one or a few related species exclusively. Some of them are actually so specialised that they are restricted to a particular habitat or have been collected only at specific times of the year.

Specimens of the new species can now be seen in some of the most reputed natural museums, including the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, Natural History Museum of London and the Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad in Santo Domingo, Costa Rica.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Pensoft Publishers. The original story is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Jose L. Fernandez-Triana, James B. Whitfield, M. Alex Smith, Robert Kula, Winnie Hallwachs, Daniel Janzen. Revision of the genera Microplitis and Snellenius (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica, with a key to all species previously described from Mesoamerica. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 2015; 62 (2): 137 DOI: 10.3897/dez.62.5276

Cite This Page:

Pensoft Publishers. "Better off apart: Wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius revised and proved separate." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 20 July 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150720133247.htm>.
Pensoft Publishers. (2015, July 20). Better off apart: Wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius revised and proved separate. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 18, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150720133247.htm
Pensoft Publishers. "Better off apart: Wasp genera Microplitis and Snellenius revised and proved separate." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150720133247.htm (accessed March 18, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES