Science News
from research organizations

Is Nutrient Loading A Smaller Problem Than We Think?

Date:
July 25, 2007
Source:
Dauphin Island Sea Lab
Summary:
A recent journal article in Estuaries and Coasts suggests that the problems with coastal sea grass destruction may not be so much due to eutrophication, as is commonly believed, but due to the depletion of top-level consumers in coastal and estuarine ecosystems. This paradigm could have major repercussions for management of coastal ecosystems, considering the research and management emphasis of recent decades on nutrient control.
Share:
FULL STORY

A recent journal article in Estuaries and Coasts suggests that the problems with coastal sea grass destruction may not be so much due to eutrophication, as is commonly believed, but due to the depletion of top-level consumers in coastal and estuarine ecosystems.

Coastal science gospel states that eutrophication caused by elevated nutrient loadings has triggered major alterations of coastal ecosystem structure and function. The article, authored by Dauphin Island Sea Lab scientists Dr. Ken Heck and Dr. John Valentine, turns this conventional wisdom on its head, making the case that the cause of these problems can be found at the top, rather than the bottom, of the food web.

The authors assert that rather than nutrient loadings, the more likely culprit is the depletion of top-level consumers in coastal and estuarine ecosystems. Indirect effects of the removal of large consumers are often indistinguishable from effects of nutrient loading, they argue, and they present evidence gathered from more than 100 studies of coral reefs, rocky intertidal areas, and sea grass beds to support the claim.

For example, the authors report that studies evaluating the relative effects of consumers and nutrient supplies on algal biomass have often concluded that consumer (top-down) effects are greater or equal to those of nutrients.

One example they cite takes on the classic model of loss of estuarine seagrass. While common understanding holds that nutrient enrichment leads to epiphytic growth on seagrass, killing the plants by blocking sunlight, cascading trophic effects are likely have just as much influence. Epiphytic abundance is also controlled by grazers, the absence of which would have the same overgrowth effect as nutrient enrichment.

This paradigm could have major repercussions for management of coastal ecosystems, considering the research and management emphasis of recent decades on nutrient control. Especially if upper trophic levels have been altered, nutrient reduction is unlikely to help restore benthic habitats, note the authors.

Reference: Heck, K. L. Jr. and J. F. Valentine. 2007. The primacy of top-down effects in shallow benthic ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts 30(3): 371-381.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Dauphin Island Sea Lab. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

Dauphin Island Sea Lab. "Is Nutrient Loading A Smaller Problem Than We Think?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 25 July 2007. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070724161631.htm>.
Dauphin Island Sea Lab. (2007, July 25). Is Nutrient Loading A Smaller Problem Than We Think?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070724161631.htm
Dauphin Island Sea Lab. "Is Nutrient Loading A Smaller Problem Than We Think?." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070724161631.htm (accessed May 23, 2017).

RELATED STORIES