Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Are Reintroduced Wolves Eating Too Many Baby Moose?

Date:
October 1, 1999
Source:
Society For Conservation Biology
Summary:
Moose populations are relatively low in the Yellowstone area and some blame the wolves and grizzly bears that are returning after a 60-year absence. But new research shows that fewer moose are getting pregnant, suggesting that the real reason is there simply isn't enough food for more moose.

Moose populations are relatively low in the Yellowstone area and some blame the wolves and grizzly bears that are returning after a 60-year absence. But new research shows that fewer moose are getting pregnant, suggesting that the real reason is there simply isn't enough food for more moose.

This study is presented in the October issue of Conservation Biology by Joel Berger of the University of Nevada in Reno, Ward Testa of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game in Anchorage, Tom Roffe of the U.S. Geological Survey in Bozeman, Montana, and Steven Monfort of the National Zoological Park in Front Royal, Virginia.

To determine moose pregnancy rates, Berger and his colleagues analyzed fecal progesterone levels. They found that in protected areas of the greater Yellowstone ecosystem, moose pregnancy rates fell from 90% in 1966 to 75% today, making them among the lowest in North America. This suggests that the drop in young moose is not due to wolves and grizzly bears. Rather, the researchers suspect that the number of moose is limited by the abundance of willows, their major winter food.

"We are pushing the envelope here and suggesting that knowing pregnancy rates can tell us whether populations are at or above the food ceiling of their ecosystem," says Berger.

The researchers' fecal pregnancy test will help people monitor the effects of large carnivores as they are restored to reserves in North America, Europe and Africa. The fact that the test is non-invasive makes it particularly useful in national parks, where handling animals is generally discouraged, and in remote areas, where reaching the animals is difficult.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Society For Conservation Biology. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Society For Conservation Biology. "Are Reintroduced Wolves Eating Too Many Baby Moose?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 October 1999. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991001063555.htm>.
Society For Conservation Biology. (1999, October 1). Are Reintroduced Wolves Eating Too Many Baby Moose?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 22, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991001063555.htm
Society For Conservation Biology. "Are Reintroduced Wolves Eating Too Many Baby Moose?." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991001063555.htm (accessed August 22, 2014).

Share This




More Plants & Animals News

Friday, August 22, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Endangered Red Wolves Face Uncertain Future

Endangered Red Wolves Face Uncertain Future

AP (Aug. 22, 2014) A federal judge temporarily banned coyote hunting to save endangered red wolves, but local hunters say that the wolf preservation program does more harm than good. Meanwhile federal officials are reviewing its wolf program in North Carolina. (Aug. 22) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Farm Resurgence Grows With Younger Crowd

Farm Resurgence Grows With Younger Crowd

AP (Aug. 22, 2014) New England farms are seeing a surge in younger farm hands as the 'buy local' food movement grows across the country. (Aug. 22) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Drug Used To Treat 'Ebola's Cousin' Shows Promise

Drug Used To Treat 'Ebola's Cousin' Shows Promise

Newsy (Aug. 21, 2014) An experimental drug used to treat Marburg virus in rhesus monkeys could give new insight into a similar treatment for Ebola. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Terrifying City-Dwelling Spiders Are Bigger And More Fertile

Terrifying City-Dwelling Spiders Are Bigger And More Fertile

Newsy (Aug. 21, 2014) According to a new study, spiders that live in cities are bigger, fatter and multiply faster. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins