New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Denosumab does not increase infection risk in rheumatic disease patients when used alone or in combination with biologic dmards

Date:
November 16, 2014
Source:
American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
Summary:
Patients with rheumatic diseases who are treated with denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®) either alone, or in combination with either biologic or non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), do not appear to have a significant increased risk of infections.
Share:
FULL STORY

Patients with rheumatic diseases who are treated with denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®) either alone, or in combination with either biologic or non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), do not appear to have a significant increased risk of infections, according to new research presented at the American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting in Boston.

People with a number of rheumatic diseases use DMARDs to treat their inflammation and help control disease activity, including rheumatoid arthritis, or RA. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disease that causes pain, stiffness, swelling and limitation in the motion and function of multiple joints. Although joints are the principal body parts affected by RA, inflammation may develop in other organs as well. An estimated 1.3 million Americans have RA, and the disease typically affects women twice as often as men.

Due to their immunosuppressant mechanisms, biologic DMARDs, may increase the risk of infection in rheumatic disease patients. It is unknown if denosumab, a RANK-ligand inhibitor used in the treatment of osteoporosis, also increases infection susceptibility. RANK is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily, so may also suppress the immune system. Past research has showed an increase in cellulitis and erysipelas in patients on denosumab.

To find out if denosumab increased infection risk in rheumatic disease patients, researchers at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia culled retrospective data from chart reviews of patients in specialty rheumatology practice to evaluate infection rates and hospitalizations of 136 patients: 36 on a combination of biologics and denosumab, 50 on biologic agents alone and 50 on denosumab alone. The biologics studied included infliximab (Remicade®), tocilizumab (Actemra®), rituximab (Rituxan®), belimumab (Benlysta®), abatacept (Orencia®), adalimumab (Humira®) and golimumab (Simponi®).

"The objective of the study was to evaluate whether denosumab with a biologic will increase risk of infection more than that from a biologic alone. We were also interested to see if addition of oral DMARDs and prednisone to denosumab would influence the risk of infection," said Sajina Prabhakaran, MD of Drexel University in Philadelphia and a lead author of the study.

The researchers found no difference in infection risk between the groups that received both biologic and denosumab compared to biologics alone. There were statistically significant increases in the risk of infection in the groups that received both biologic and denosumab compared to the group that received denosumab only, as well as the group taking only a biologic compared to only denosumab.

Hospitalization rates were higher in the combination group compared to those taking only denosumab. There were statistically significant increases in the risk of infection with increased duration of exposure to biologics as well. Secondary characteristics also did not affect the compared rates of infection.

The study's authors concluded that denosumab, taken either alone or in combination with biologics, does not significantly increase infection risk in rheumatic disease patients. Patients' duration of exposure to denosumab also did not affect the infection rate. In addition, the authors noticed no increased risk of infection in patients on a combination of non-biologic DMARDs and denosumab. They concluded that it seems relatively safe to use denosumab in combination with other disease-modifying drugs to treat rheumatic disease patients.

"Although the safety profile of denosumab has been studied in the past and it has shown to be relatively safe with a slight increase in skin infections this is the first study to evaluate infection risk in combination with a biologic," said Dr. Prabhakaran. "Our study showed no increase in the risk of infection in patients who received denosumab with a biologic over the patients who received a biologic alone. These results suggest that denosumab may be safely administered in patients with connective tissue diseases on biologics who already have an increased risk of metabolic bone disease."


Story Source:

Materials provided by American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

American College of Rheumatology (ACR). "Denosumab does not increase infection risk in rheumatic disease patients when used alone or in combination with biologic dmards." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 16 November 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141116094054.htm>.
American College of Rheumatology (ACR). (2014, November 16). Denosumab does not increase infection risk in rheumatic disease patients when used alone or in combination with biologic dmards. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 25, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141116094054.htm
American College of Rheumatology (ACR). "Denosumab does not increase infection risk in rheumatic disease patients when used alone or in combination with biologic dmards." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141116094054.htm (accessed April 25, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES