Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Manipulative Mothers Subdue Show-Off Sons, Bird Researchers Demonstrate

Nov. 10, 2011 — Choosing the sex of our offspring may seem totally beyond our control, but some animals have a remarkable capacity to manipulate this. The female eclectus parrot, for example, has been known to produce 20 sons in a row before switching to producing only daughters. Now, a team of evolutionary biologists has found that tight control over offspring sex ratios can have disastrous consequences for sexual selection.


Share This:

Led by Dr Tim Fawcett, a research fellow at the University of Bristol, the team used mathematical models and computer simulations to investigate how sex-ratio control and sexual selection interact. With sex ratios fixed at 50-50, the scientists found the classical pattern of sexual selection, with males evolving elaborate courtship displays to attract females. But when they changed the models so that mothers could control the sex ratio of their offspring, they found a completely different pattern.

"The effect was dramatic," said Dr Fawcett. "When mothers choose the sex of their offspring, sexual selection collapses and male courtship displays disappear. This is because females no longer find the displays attractive."

The finding adds an unexpected twist to Darwin's theory of sexual selection. "Previously, we thought that females needed to find a showy male to produce the best offspring. But when they can control the sex ratio, this no longer matters. Mothers with drab partners do just as well," Dr Fawcett added.

The scientists now plan to put their theory to the test. If they are right, this may help us to understand the great diversity in male courtship displays seen across the animal kingdom.

"In many animals, including humans, sex is determined by the genes," Dr Fawcett explained, "while other animals have a much more flexible system. Some turtles, for example, produce sons when their eggs are kept cool and daughters when their eggs are kept hot. We expect to find strong differences in sexual selection between these systems."

The research is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Bristol.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Tim W. Fawcett, Bram Kuijper, Franz J. Weissing, Ido Pen. Sex-ratio control erodes sexual selection, revealing evolutionary feedback from adaptive plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105721108
APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,690

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
Interested in ad-free access? If you'd like to read ScienceDaily without ads, let us know!
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google:

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

  • more science news

In Other News ...

  • more top news

Science Video News


The Taste Gene

In the first study to link taste genes to behavior in children, researchers looked at how natural variations in a recently discovered taste gene. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?