New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Defending the validity of Stokes-Einstein equation in living systems

Research should help scientists understand antibiotic resistance and the mechanical properties of cancer cells

Date:
July 13, 2022
Source:
University of Arkansas
Summary:
New research defends the validity of the Stokes-Einstein equation, one of Albert Einstein's most famous equations, as it relates to biology. The research will help scientists better understand antibiotic resistance and the mechanical properties of cancer cells.
Share:
FULL STORY

A physicist at the University of Arkansas has defended the validity of the Stokes-Einstein equation, one of Albert Einstein's most famous equations, as it relates to biology. The research will help scientists better understand antibiotic resistance and the mechanical properties of cancer cells.

Working with proteins in live bacteria, Yong Wang, assistant professor in the Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences, tested the 117-year-old equation, which provided evidence for the reality of atoms and molecules. He found that the famous equation remained valid for explaining how molecules move inside bacteria.

"Bacterial cytoplasm is not a simple soup," Wang said. "Our study showed that it might be more like spaghetti with tomato sauce and meatballs."

Cytoplasm is the crowded and complex material inside bacteria. It has high concentrations of large biological molecules, including millions of proteins, carbohydrates and salts, and all kinds of polymers and filaments, such as DNA and RNA.

Wang found that although Einstein's equation appeared to be off for proteins' motion within live bacteria, it remained valid by taking into account the entangled polymers and filaments inside bacteria.

The so-called Einstein relation -- also called the Stokes-Einstein equation -- is one of Albert Einstein's major research accomplishments in his "year of miracles," 1905. Explaining the mobility of particles through liquid, the equation has been characterized as a stochastic model for Brownian motion, meaning particles move around randomly because of collisions with surrounding molecules. Most importantly, the theory provided early empirical evidence for the reality of atoms and molecules.

However, over the past two decades, scientists have challenged the theory's validity as it applies to what's inside live cells and bacteria. Wang's study adds to this body of knowledge, helping resolve the current controversy.

More importantly, it provides a foundation for assessing the mechanical properties of cells and bacteria based on the Einstein relation. This should help scientists understand antibiotic resistance of certain microorganisms and the mechanical properties of cancer cells, which differ from than the mechanical properties of normal, healthy cells.

On this study, which was published in Physical Review Letters, Wang worked with Lin Oliver, professor and chair of the department of physics, and Asmaa Sadoon, doctoral student in the microelectronics-photonics program.


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Arkansas. Original written by Matt McGowan. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Asmaa A. Sadoon, William F. Oliver, Yong Wang. Revisiting the Temperature Dependence of Protein Diffusion inside Bacteria: Validity of the Stokes-Einstein Equation. Physical Review Letters, 2022; 129 (1) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.018101

Cite This Page:

University of Arkansas. "Defending the validity of Stokes-Einstein equation in living systems." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 13 July 2022. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/07/220713201358.htm>.
University of Arkansas. (2022, July 13). Defending the validity of Stokes-Einstein equation in living systems. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 5, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/07/220713201358.htm
University of Arkansas. "Defending the validity of Stokes-Einstein equation in living systems." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/07/220713201358.htm (accessed December 5, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES