New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Home-made face masks likely need at least two layers to curb COVID-19 spread

Reduces dispersal of airborne viral droplets from nose and mouth, but three layers preferable

Date:
July 23, 2020
Source:
BMJ
Summary:
Home-made cloth face masks likely need a minimum of two layers, and preferably three, to prevent the dispersal of viral droplets from the nose and mouth that are associated with the spread of COVID-19, a new study indicates.
Share:
FULL STORY

Home-made cloth face masks likely need a minimum of two layers, and preferably three, to prevent the dispersal of viral droplets from the nose and mouth that are associated with the spread of COVID-19, indicates a video case study published online in the journal Thorax.

Viral droplets are generated during coughing, sneezing, or speaking. And face masks are thought to protect healthy people from inhaling infectious droplets as well as reducing the spread from those who are already infected.

But worldwide shortages of personal protective equipment during the pandemic have led some health agencies, such as the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), to recommend the use of home-made cloth face coverings as an alternative to surgical face masks.

Several types of material have been suggested for these, but based on little or no evidence of how well they work.

A team of Australian researchers therefore compared the effectiveness of single and double-layer cloth face coverings (175 g/m² cotton fabric, with a thread count of 170/ inch) with a 3-ply surgical face mask (Bao Thach) at reducing droplet spread.

The single layer covering was made from a folded piece of cotton T shirt and hair ties; the double layer covering was made using the sew method, as set out by CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/how-to-make-cloth-face-covering.html

The researchers used a tailored LED lighting system and a high-speed camera to film the dispersal of airborne droplets produced by a healthy person with no respiratory infection, during speaking, coughing, and sneezing while wearing each type of mask.

The video recording showed that the 3-ply surgical face mask was the most effective at reducing airborne droplet dispersal, although even a single layer cloth face covering reduced the droplet spread from speaking.

But a double layer covering was better than a single layer in reducing the droplet spread from coughing and sneezing, the recording showed.

This is just one case, added to which several other factors contribute to the effectiveness of cloth face masks, note the researchers. These include the type of material used, design and fit, as well as the frequency of washing.

Nevertheless, based on their observations, a home made cloth mask with at least two layers is preferable to a single layer mask, they say, adding: "Guidelines on home-made cloth masks should stipulate multiple layers."

And they emphasise: "There is a need for more evidence to inform safer cloth mask design, and countries should ensure adequate manufacturing or procurement of surgical masks."


Story Source:

Materials provided by BMJ. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Prateek Bahl, Shovon Bhattacharjee, Charitha de Silva, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, Con Doolan, C Raina MacIntyre. Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study. Thorax, July 24, 2020; DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215748

Cite This Page:

BMJ. "Home-made face masks likely need at least two layers to curb COVID-19 spread." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 23 July 2020. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200723185741.htm>.
BMJ. (2020, July 23). Home-made face masks likely need at least two layers to curb COVID-19 spread. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 25, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200723185741.htm
BMJ. "Home-made face masks likely need at least two layers to curb COVID-19 spread." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200723185741.htm (accessed April 25, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES